“Between justice and genocide, there is, in the long run, no middle ground” Lois McMaster Bujold Brothers in Arms
There is either justice (treating a group of people as equals with ourselves, actively treating them with all due rights and respect as we ourselves would claim), or a tendency to treat a group of people as “others”, as less-than, as not-equal, non-human, not deserving of anything from us, until they are not deserving of their own way of life or even of life at all (genocide).
There is also treating the “other” as an enemy, or a sinful abomination etc, that must be destroyed, but we are speaking of “moderation”.
It is a very slippery slope.
If not justice, then destruction. Again, make no mistake, either we seek justice for a group of people, or we seek their destruction, and destruction can be brought about by many different means.
Microaggressions are still aggressions. Small injustices are still injustices.
They all come from the same othering, lessening, damning intent, and are no more innocent than burning a cross in someone’s front yard in the middle of the night.
A thousand tiny needles cut a person to ribbons as mortally as a broadsword.
A million casual, absent-minded blows, a million ignored calls for help, kill as effectively as an engineered and determined campaign.
Microaggressions are only smoothed over when aggression is felt to be applicable, justifiable when it is implicitly condoned.
Escalation of that aggression is also, inherently, and in advance, condoned.
Any excuse will serve, but no excuse is necessary at all. The judgment is already decided, justice has already been withholding, redefined in exclusionary terms- justice is only for “us”, not “them”.
We defend our own and destroy all others.
We spend a lot of energy denying this, on both sides of the many us/them divides.